More Dutch teams are using video to communicate faster and reduce meetings. While Loom has long been a popular tool for quick recordings, many organizations in the Netherlands start to feel limitations once video becomes part of everyday team workflows.

This article explains why Dutch teams look for a Loom alternative for business use, and what matters most when choosing an async video tool in a European context.

👉 Looking for a broader overview of tools? See the full guide: Top Loom alternatives for teams

Why Dutch Teams Look Beyond Loom

Loom works well for individual recordings, but teams often encounter friction as usage grows:

• costs increase quickly due to per-user pricing
• limited collaboration around videos
• little structure for team-wide use
• sharing outside the organization can be restrictive
• harder to scale across departments

At the same time, Dutch companies increasingly rely on async communication to support hybrid and remote work.

Teams want:

• fewer meetings
• clearer handovers
• better focus

Async video fits this shift – as long as the tool supports team workflows.

What Dutch Companies Expect from a Business Loom Alternative

For business use, teams look beyond basic recording features.

Key expectations often include:

• team-wide access without seat restrictions
• simple, browser-based recording
• easy sharing via a single link
• clear structure for internal and external videos
• visibility into engagement and usage

For many Dutch and EU-based teams, privacy awareness and compliance expectations also play a role when selecting tools.

Why Videolink Fits Dutch Teams Well

Videolink is designed with team collaboration and async workflows in mind.

For Dutch teams, this means:

• no seat-based pricing – one organization, broad access
• recording directly in the browser, without installs
• built-in editing (trim, blur, annotations, branding)
• frictionless sharing with optional access control
• insights into who watched and when

This makes video usable across teams – not limited to a few individuals.

Who Benefits Most from This Approach?

Business Teams

Use video for internal updates, explanations, and knowledge sharing without adding meetings.

Sales & Account Teams

Share demos, proposals, and walkthroughs asynchronously, without scheduling calls.

Customer Support Teams

Explain solutions visually, reduce ticket back-and-forth, and reuse answers.

Hybrid & Remote Teams

Collaborate across time zones and schedules with less coordination overhead.

When Loom May Still Be Enough

Loom can still work if:

• video is used occasionally
• recordings are mostly personal
• collaboration happens elsewhere

For teams that rely on video daily and across departments, team-focused async tools often scale better.

👉 Read more: Why Videolink works better for teams than Loom

Async Video and Modern Work in the Netherlands

Hybrid work is now standard for many Dutch organizations. Async video helps teams:

• reduce meeting load
• communicate more clearly
• document knowledge
• stay focused

The value isn’t more video – it’s better collaboration.

Conclusion

For Dutch companies using video in a business context, choosing the right tool matters.

A Loom alternative for teams should:

• support collaboration
• scale without per-user friction
• remain easy for everyone to use

Videolink aligns well with these needs, especially for organizations working asynchronously.